Peanut butter cups, duct tape, and social media: They’re more alike than you think.

Reese's Peanut Butter CupI really thought I was done writing about “social media.” I’ve been bored with it for a long time, over saturated, jaded, stick-a-fork-in-me done. Yet recently I had a conversation with a new online friend of mine that reminded me of one big reason why.  (And in my usual ironic fashion, I thought I’d write about why I’m done with writing about it. However, consider this the last post before a big shift.)

Anyway, back to my friend. Like the friends I’ve been making online since the days of IRC, she and I bonded over our mutual love of music. Only we met via Twitter, not IRC or a BBS. She’s not one of of the myriad marketing/PR/”social media” people on Twitter, nor does she have any more than 200 followers, and you know what? That’s OK. Neither the tool, nor the perceived online “klout” matters as much as what was the glue that brought us together, which was music.

I really enjoyed conversing with her for a few weeks, so I invited her to befriend me on Facebook. Her reply (strung together from a couple DMs) went something like this:

Thanks. I’ll keep it in mind if I decide to add more pals to my Facebook acct. Right now I only follow my kids. I’ve ranted against Facebook for a long time. Now that I’m on it, I’m afraid if I befriend one person over another, someone will get pissed.

I told her not to worry about what the social media pundits/gurus/ninjas/unicorn jockeys say, and to just use social media however it works best for her. She said to me, “Oh, it’s not just them, it’s how I’ve seen the people around me use Facebook. I have no desire to be bombarded by baby pictures!”

We all have our different policies on whom we befriend on the world’s largest social network and why (or why not), but I thought I’d reach out, because, well … I dig her. She did accept my friend request, which I appreciated, but would totally understand had she decided not to.

Though this particular situation is about personal use of Facebook, the implications of her comments are much farther-reaching and apply just as well to the business aspect. . . both of which drive me batshit crazy.

Echo chamber or baloney machine?

Baloney Faces

This is wrong on so many levels.

Every day, the social media pundits in the blogosphere churn out an immeasurable barrage of “best practices” posts, and at any given time, there is a conference, seminar, webinar, or tweetup going on all about the “right way” to do things on the social web vs. the “wrong way,” yada yada yada.

Scroll through your RSS reader or click any random link in Twitter and chances are you’ll see headlines like “10 Social Media Best Practices for ___” and “5 Reasons Not To Do ___ on [insert social tool du jour here].”  Not only does it get tiring to hear after a while, once you’ve worked with enough companies and individual clients on your own, your bullshit  baloney meter gets as finely-tuned as your patience for hearing it grows thin.

The average person on the web and the average client, whether they’re a small business, a big corporation, or just the lady down the street who enjoys tweeting during NBC’s The Voice  is so bombarded with all these messages, it’s no wonder that they feel pressure to do things the way it’s allegedly “supposed to be” done.

I’ve encountered people who were very frustrated and distraught because they’ve spent money on conferences, webinars, and books all about how they can make social media work for their business, yet they’re not seeing any significant difference in revenue. They’ve followed all the “steps” and did everything all the usual case studies did, but they’re throwing in the towel and saying it’s a waste of time and money.

The fact is, you can follow all the advice from all those sources as much as you want, but if you forget who you are and what your needs are, it’s probably not going to work out for you. Nothing is cookie-cutter, social media doesn’t come in a box, and if you try to follow instructions like that, you’re only going to end up half-baked.  (Pun unintended.)

But… what about the case studies?

Case studies are great, and it’s important to discuss what’s working and what’s not. It’s great to see examples of how companies used certain tools to work to their advantage. But only Zappos is Zappos, only Comcast is Comcast, and only Company X is Company X. You can learn from their trials and tribulations, you can employ their tactics, but what it all comes down to is what works best for you. Everything is subjective. 

Case studies stand out because the company in the study was willing to experiment. The companies (and people) were willing to stick their neck out and try stuff. But for every “best practice” being preached on and about the social web, there is someone doing the exact opposite and it’s working out just fine. (If not a case study such as, “How Company Y Did It Wrong and Got It All Right.”)

Social media is a bunch of tools.

Beavis and Butt-Head

Uh... huh... huh ... she said "tools."

Let’s ignore the double-entendre there for a second and admit that tools are things that exist in order to carry out a particular function.

The other day I saw a tweet that said something like, “I should be able to tell what you do from briefly looking at your twitter profile.” I don’t remember the particular tool who said it (see what I did there?), but to them I say:

Says who?

Who is anybody to say how anybody else should use a tool? My goals for using a certain tool are different from others’ goals. Pardon me for putting my own goals in front of someone else’s expectations of how I “should” act on the social web. Frankly, I don’t care about advertising on Twitter what I “do,” I just want to have fun. So what’s with the self-righteousness?

If you know the history, it was by its users’ ingenuity and NOT using Twitter how it was originally intended that made it grow to what it is today.  Same goes for duct tape. When was the last time you used duct tape on a heat duct? There’s more than one way to use a certain tool, and hell, there’s more than one way to eat a Reese’s.  The examples are infinite.

duct tapeIt’s no secret that I am one of the many people on Twitter who HATE automatic direct messages (“auto dms”). In fact, I despise them so much that I put right on my background “I auto-unfollow all auto-dms.” I think they’re extremely annoying. But a lot of people and companies still auto-dm, and it appears that they’re doing just fine on Twitter. So if it works for them, who am I to tell them not to do it?

I just know that personally, it annoys the crap out of me, so I choose not to follow people who do that. It’s my choice. It doesn’t matter how allegedly “wrong” or “right” something may be, if it works for you, that’s what matters, right?

This may be oversimplifying, if not downright insulting to the social media strategist/consultant/guru/ninja/unicorn jockey who pours all their sweat and elbow grease into blogging and advising people on what to do or what not to do, but if you run all of that echo-chamber “advice” through a metaphorical colander, it all boils down to a very common cliché:

Different strokes for different folks.

Gary Coleman

Yup, I went there.

So people, please — stop wasting your time and breath on how you think things should be done, or worrying about what other people did, and start concentrating on what works best for you. It’s great to know what worked best for others, and yes, sometimes you’ll get some great ideas, but “doin’ it wrong” for one is oftentimes “doin’ it right” for another.

Note that I’m not saying people who have NO frickin’ clue  shouldn’t seek guidance — there are plenty of seasoned professionals in the field of communications who are well-versed in navigating the digital waters and can help out those who aren’t as comfortable. People who already have experience in trying different things, are familiar with the ever-changing landscape of tools, and may be able to shed some light on possibilities and help shape a strategy.

But figure out what’s best for you. You as a person, you as a business, whatever. Stick your neck out. Experiment. Know who you are, what your goals are, what’s important to you, and especially what’s not important to you. Once you figure that out, you’ll be a lot further along than most. The internet is just an extension of life — everything is trial and error.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go out and buy some duct tape, some Reese’s peanut butter cups, and somehow get that disturbing smiling bologna image out of my mind.

Fun with Twitter: Do your “overheards” tell a story?

One of the joys many people, including myself, find with Twitter is the beauty of the tweeted “overheard” statement, which is some odd statement that is, well, overheard, that you just feel compelled to share with the rest of the world. (Because of character constraints, “OH:” is usually used before the statement instead of “Overheard” though I confess when I first saw people using this I wondered what Ohio had to do with anything.)

Usually neither attribution nor context is given, which makes them that much funnier. In fact, in my office, it’s become somewhat of a competition between coworkers to see who makes my “overheard” tweets. I work with a very creative, linguistic bunch and there’s never a dull moment in our conversations. My overheard tweets aren’t always coworkers, mind you, oftentimes they’re friends outside the office, like at gigs or something.

Anyway, the other day I decided to see which gems I had tweeted “OH:” recently, so  I went to my profile and searched “OH:” in my tweets only. Twitter only archives the past few days now, which I just learned, but the tweets in my past few days’ archives were not only hilarious, but kind of sounded like a funny story if you read them in chronological order.

Keep in mind that NONE of these tweets are related in any way, shape or form, and most had completely different contexts:

damnredhead's OHs

To “get it,” you have to read from the bottom up, but to make it easier, here they are in succession:

“That’s like, WAAAAAY down the road. Like Friday.”

“Haven’t you seen Subway commercials? Don’t you know the right way to say it?”

“I wore so much black I out-blacked myself. Black is the new black!”

“You are the reason that dress was invented.”

“Woo! It’s nice and bright in here! It makes me wanna take this dress off!” #unrelatedtothelasttweet

“We’re going to drool all over her like a pork chop.”

“… and it doesn’t give you the risk of having quintuplets!”

“You just want me for my numbers.”

“You gotta perpetuate the SEO-ness of your lineage.”

“Who the hell are you and why are you soliciting me?!”

OK, maybe it’s only funny to me, but I’m curious to see if anybody else’s completely unrelated overheard tweets also look like they kinda tell a story. It’s an interesting and fun exercise.

Here’s what you do:

  1. Just view your own profile on Twitter.
  2. Plug “OH:” (or “overheard,” whichever you use) into the search box and make sure that the box is checked to read only your own tweets.
  3. Read from the bottom up.
  4. Do they kinda tell a story?
  5. If so, take a screen shot & share.

Come on, you know you want to. It’s fun!

The secret to my (alleged) Twitter “success” revealed

Image by PMarkhamThere’s nothing like tweeting about blogging and blogging about tweeting to beat a dead horse into the ground, eh?

Guess what?

I’m doing it anyway.

Last week a friend messaged me on BlackBerry messenger about something, I don’t remember the exact context, but somewhere along the line I decided to send him a link in a direct message (DM) via Twitter, and realized he wasn’t following me. So I asked him why, and he said he was “trying a different approach to his Twitter strategy” and he unfollowed a lot of people in order to reduce the noise in his stream. His logic was that if he wanted to talk to me, see what was up with me lately, etc., we’re connected on Facebook and of course, BlackBerry messenger.

I can respect that.

However, it spurned an interesting conversation about “Twitter strategies.” People put a lot of time and effort into trying to figure out how to best use this tiny tool of epic proportions. Ari Herzog has been experimenting with it and documenting his findings, which, from an analytical perspective, is very interesting.

People ask me what my Twitter strategy is quite a bit. To my knowledge, I’ve never really divulged the details of what it is in writing, until now.

Are you ready? After the jump, you’ll find out my own personal Twitter strategy. (If you came here on a direct link, you won’t see the “Read more” thing.)

[Read more...]

I can quit Twitter, but Twitter can’t quit me.

Between friends getting married, friends passing away, getting used to a new schedule, and just overall life things, you could say I’ve had a lot going on lately. Sometimes, one can only take so much before wanting/needing to pull the plug on some things that cause more noise than signal in life.

The other day, after attending the funeral of a friend, I decided to quit Twitter for a while.

I’m quitting Twitter for a while. See ya.Mon Jun 14 21:08:11 via UberTwitter

Many didn’t think I could do it. I’ve tried to “take a Twitter hiatus” before, and have only lasted a few days, at most. This time, however, I was pretty sure that I was done spewing <140 character blurts into the ether for a while. I just needed my “Stacy time,” my time to be lost in my own thoughts without the internet bugging me or me bugging it.

I really thought I could do it.

Fat chance.

It didn’t occur to me until after I had posted the above that even when I have no intention of tweeting, I tweet anyway. I’ve integrated so many webby things with my Twitter account that it’s nearly impossible.

Hitting the “Tweet this” button at the top of an interesting blog post or article after reading it has become second nature to me. BOOM! There’s a tweet.

If I subscribe to a YouTube channel? BOOM! There’s a tweet.

If I just “like” a video on YouTube? BOOM! There’s a tweet.

If I check in somewhere on FourSquare? You got it — BOOM! There’s a tweet.

You get the idea.

try as I might, I realized I can’t quit Twitter for a while so long as I have things autotweet to it like 4sq & stuff I like on YouTube. :( Tue Jun 15 18:02:40 via HootSuite

Not to mention, that if somebody chooses to retweet (RT) or reply to one of my auto-tweeted tweets, it’s usually appropriate to say something back to them.

Oh sure, I could manually go and remove all of my Twitter connections/integrations on each app, but really, that’s a lot to go though if I’m only planning on a temporary hiatus. Plus, I’d have to re-hook it all back up when I came back.

So I guess I’m stuck tweeting, whether I intend to or not.

I guess I just find it funny — these days, there are still hoards of people trying to figure out HOW to use Twitter and why; meanwhile, I’m so enmeshed in it that I can’t easily quit using Twitter, even if I wanted to.

Has anybody else had this problem?!

Just when I think it’s safe to play #FollowFriday again.

Picture 2

cookiemonsterIt’s no secret that I hate the Twitter meme of #FollowFriday. I wrote a rant post back in March about why I’m not playing anymore, and I’ve stood by that pretty adamantly. Ari Herzog, who wrote a recent post about the meme, shares the same sentiment as I do, which is,

I recommend Twitter users every day–when retweeting their thoughts or web links, when thanking them for prior advice, or when singling out unique people.

I thought that the madness of the random, meaningless, lists of people to #FollowFriday (or #FF) recommend had ended since I wrote that post in March. I thought that things had calmed down.

So last Friday I dipped my toe back into the Follow Friday meme and posted a #FF recommendation and gave reason as to WHY people should follow that person, as one should. So far, so good.

Today I tweeted that I lost half a cookie in my morning coffee, in melodramatic distraught. Next thing I know, Cookie Monster is following me on Twitter. The Official Cookie Monster (not to be confused with all those Cookie Monster impostors out there, mind you). I felt rather honored that such Muppet royalty would follow me, so I recommended him for #FollowFriday. After all, his Twitter account is hilarious … assuming that’s the real Official Cookie Monster and not some paid personal Muppet assistant.

I was away from my computer the majority of the day. I came back and checked my notifications to find the usual handful of random people following me that I had never heard of. I always check out each individual person that follows me to 1) make sure they’re not a bot, and 2) see if they’re anybody I find interesting enough to follow in the 3 second glance I take at their profile.

One such profile was this, and I took sympathy on the woman to attempt to protect her identity and those of the people in her background:

wtftwitter

Pardon my french, but…

WHAT THE HELL?!?!

Bad Behavior has blocked 229 access attempts in the last 7 days.