Don’t fish in my friends and I won’t pee in your pool.

While everybody’s having their usual post-Facebook-changes anyeurism, where they kick and scream about a service they don’t pay for making changes as if there isn’t anything actually significant going on in the world, I’d like to take a moment and talk about the privacy issue.

No, not the usual “Facebook just changed/simplified/complicated/sold-your-shoe-size-to-the-government” privacy issue that occurs once in a while, but of a different kind. The kind that I consider a violation between friends.

The issue I’m talking about here is “friend fishing.” It’s when somebody goes through your list of friends, which you’ve made visible on the side of your profile, and friend requests people that they really have no business “friending.” People who you KNOW there is no humanly possible way that they could actually know this person except through you.

I don’t want to, and I’m not going to name names here, but this has happened on more than a few occasions with my musician friends, however recently it happened in a slightly different context.

I became aware of this over a year ago, when suddenly in the Facebook stream I saw something like,

“[Your Netiquette-Unaware Musician Friend] is now friends with [your third grade teacher, 5 sorority sisters, 1 coworker, 2 of your friends in Hong Kong, and 7 people in some other kind of completely irrelevant context].”

THIS IS NOT COOL.

Sure, I know that the other person on the other side of the friend request is not obligated to accept a friend request. But many of those people blindly accept friend reqs from anybody with whom they have just one person in common, not knowing any better, and/or just not caring, and/or are way too trusting.

However, to the person whose friends list you are fishing, THIS FEELS LIKE A VIOLATION. A violation of trust between real “friends,” a violation of privacy, a violation of boundaries.

When this started becoming a pattern, I decided to just avoid having that awkward “that’s really not cool” conversation with perpetrators and threw everybody in my “music world” into a list of people who can’t see my other friends. Maybe I was lazy, maybe I just didn’t want to have to keep having that conversation. Either way, it seemed like an easy fix. Many people in that world of mine simply AREN’T social-media-etiquette savvy. They don’t know any better, many are all about the “friend collecting,” and Lord knows I get REALLY sick of being on this soapbox.

I’m not saying all musicians do this, mind you. I’m just saying what I’ve noticed among my network has been mostly people in my “music world,” so to speak. What prompted me to write this was a little earlier, I suddenly saw an update in my stream that looked like

“[Guy You've Known Since Middle School] is now friends with [Your Recently-Found, Long-Lost, Very-Close Friend (Who Happens to be a Musician) and Said Guy Remembers You Talking About Her, Which Probably is What Prompted the Subsequent Friending."]

I literally said out loud, “Um, WHAT?!”

Look — THAT’S JUST NOT COOL.

I immediately made it so that NONE of my friends can see who else I’m friends with. But I shouldn’t have to do that. If I let you see my friends list, I am trusting that you’re not going to fish through it and abuse it. I leave it open for the real situations where people I know might go through it and find other people that we actually do have in common, like were in the same high school class, ski club, whatever.

Yeah, okay, so this post is likely a few months too late, with all the newfangled friends-filtering options Facebook has rolled out recently, and let’s not forget the advent of Google Plus and their “Circles” concept, all of which theoretically should solve this problem.

Theoretically.

Look, I'm being metaphorical and literal here simultaneously!But this raises a couple questions.

1) Who is going to take the time and go through their already-established, pretty-darn-big network they’ve curated, and meticulously put people into certain piles? I’m not an OCD-in-training 7 y/o separating my Skittles by color because “they have to be that way.” I like all my Skittles to be in the same bag, and although I like to “taste the rainbow” and see all the pretty colors mixed together, I also know that some flavors just don’t mix well together. (Oh, the metaphor… I’m SO deep, I know.)

2) The bigger question it raises is trust. Yes, trust between friends and respect of privacy and boundaries, but I’m talking about a bigger trust here. Trust among ourselves as a society.

If we can’t trust our friends to respect the fences we’ve put around other areas of our lives so much that we have to rely on The Powers That Be of social networks to enable us to tighten those fences… are we, as a society, REALLY ready for what we’ve gotten ourselves into, technologically? Socially? Psychologically?

I don’t think we are, honestly. Some circles aren’t made to be broken, some fences aren’t meant to be scaled, and some lines aren’t meant to be crossed.

I would love to hear your thoughts.

 

Photo 1 by bodog Dan, pic 2 is album art from Depeche Mode’s Violator, and if you don’t know what pic 3 is, you’re reading this from some other planet. 

The only rule of online privacy you need to know.

o-hai-googlz-i-can-has-privacy.jpgIn case you’ve been living under a rock, there’s been a lot of hullabaloo about Facebook’s privacy settings lately.  Facebook, which started as a network where people could share their information privately, has loosened their privacy options/settings/system/whatever over the past few years to be everything but private.

Yada, yada, yada . . . I’ve done enough research about this to make my head spin.

However, when it all comes down to it, I’m not sure if the public is freaking out about privacy settings as much as the media says it is.

Regardless, whether we agree with Facebook’s ethics (or lack thereof) in this situation, there’s only one rule you need to know when it comes to online privacy, and this is the rule that I live by:

Don’t put anything online you wouldn’t want your mom to see.

Period.

It’s common sense, people. The internet is a very public place. Clamp down on privacy settings all you want, but it may be best to withhold from the internet anything you wouldn’t want leaked by a mutual friend and relayed to someone halfway across the planet in a Party Bingo chat room. Meaning, if you have stuff online that you would rather your mom not see, you probably shouldn’t have put it there in the first place.

Now, I know there are situations where people will upload not-so-flattering pictures of you and tag you on Facebook. Guess what? You have the option to not let people see tagged photos and videos of you. Look in the privacy settings. Guess what else? You can also remove tags. These were always options, even way before the recent Facebook privacy debacle.

No, this doesn’t mean that incriminating stuff of you won’t be seen by others, there are always the friends of the people that uploaded it in the first place, but still — you’ve got a better chance of covering your own hide this way than fussing over what Facebook is deciding to do with your information this week.

Are there some embarrassing pics on Facebook of me that I didn’t upload? You betcha. But my mom is my friend on Facebook, and she can’t see them. Nor can my dentist, my former college professor, or Jerrod Niemann. There’s nothing my mom can’t see that anybody else can.

Of course, that doesn’t mean she doesn’t comment things like “Please don’t get any more tattoos…” when I post pictures of my friends’ new tattoos, but hey . . . shes my mom! She’s supposed to be worried about that kind of stuff! (And since a good friend of mine owns a tattoo parlor, she’s got every reason to.)

So I’m wondering, are you freaking out about Facebook’s privacy flip-flopping lately? Why or why not? Or is this being overblown by the media?

Bad Behavior has blocked 249 access attempts in the last 7 days.