
One thing that annoys the heck out of me about the end of every year is that starting in December, the entire blogosphere becomes Miss Cleo and obnoxiously tries to predict what will happen in the next year in social media/tech trends, fake Jamaican accent and all. (OK, maybe I just read them in a fake Jamaican accent to make them more entertaining and bearable. Try it–you’ll see.)
Yet, seldom do most of those fake-Jamaican-accented, blogging tech prophets actually compare how well their last year’s predictions stacked up to what really happened.
I’ve never been a fan of this yearly tradition of Miss Cleoing*; all it ever does is just stir up more unnecessary noise in the echo chamber. Any idiot can pull predictions out of their butt about what the next year will bring, and few ever do any real research to make educated guesses.
As fate would have it, last year I was charged with doing just that — not pull predictions out of my butt and write a blog post, but researching past and current trends, past and current predictions, what might be under the radar, yet up-and-coming, etc. and, along with the assistance of a colleague, write a big ol’, in-depth paper of educated guesses
predictions for our own “11 Trends to Watch in 2011″ (original, I know).
Unfortunately, because of some situations beyond our control that we could not have predicted, our paper was never published.
However, I’m a pack rat when it comes to research (both digital and hard copy), and upon cleaning my desk a week or so ago, I came across my printed-out research for this shelved project, an inch-thick stack bound together by a binder clip which must have been magical because it seemed to defy the laws of physics. (I should have taken a picture.) Practically every end-of-the-year Miss Cleo post and whitepaper I could find in the blogosphere, printed out, hand-highlighted, notes written in the margins — it was enough for me to basically say to myself, “Holy crap, I did this all in vain.”
Or maybe I didn’t.
I’d like to not think that all of my research and efforts were futile. After all, I did subject myself to combing through everybody’s Miss Cleoing, which not only fueled my disdain for end-of-the-year predictions posts, but was enough to unconsciously get me reading everything in a fake Jamaican accent for the next three months. (It’s funny when you do it in your head but when you accidentally do it out loud … well, I digress.)
Anyway.
Even though it was never published, I wanted to see how I did in my educated guesses
predictions compared to what actually happened. So I dug up the outline from my files and took a look. I didn’t do too bad. I was WAY off on a few things, but you know what? Very few end-of-the-year blogosphere Miss Cleos revisit their last year’s predictions and compare them to reality (or, at least not publicly). But I will.
So here it is. The outline for the unpublished paper, my own attempt at Miss Cleoing last year and predicting what 2011 would hold. I haven’t modified it except to add the preface at the top, and clean up a couple typos.
About the beginning…
From everything I read of everybody else’s, I noticed that there was a LOT of what seems to be a common problem in this field — stating the obvious. In December 2010, many people were “predicting” what was already happening, things that were already a given. Saying that people will use a lot more apps for their every day needs (whether on tablets, phones, in browsers, etc.) is hardly prophecy. It was already happening. Saying “search will get more social” had been happening, too. Growing concern for privacy? That too.
Things that are obviously becoming (if not already) omnipresent do not count as “trends” to “predict.” That’s called practicing your superpowers as Captain Obvious.
So I acknowledged these things and moved on. After the jump, I’m going to attempt to examine each of these and whether or not they came true. As I said, I know I was way off on a few of these. Some of them I was right, but others, I’m honestly not sure and maybe you can help me out to let me know if it happened or not.
[Note: This ended up being a much longer post than I originally anticipated, but it reads quickly, I promise.]

I’ve personally always advised my clients, regardless of what kind of entity they are, that they needed to “own” their presence on the web and not rely on other platforms such as Facebook, though those are a nice complement to your online presence.
There are plenty of resources out there to buy domains and host a site. I personally prefer
A couple weeks ago, I was having “one of those days” … you know, those days where nothing’s going right and you’re in a crummy mood and you can’t seem to shake it. Out of the blue,
Yes, it’s to promote Kenny Chesney’s
In my
Meet
Disney also utilizes an extensive intranet that they call “The Portal,” for which every cast member has a login and is expected to explore to find just about anything going on within the parks whatsoever, whether continuing education classes, clubs of their interest (Toastmasters, anyone? Crew club? You got it.), Disney history, if the (internal Disney) library had a certain movie they wanted to check out, look up a certain cast member in a certain department — literally anything they can think of.

“I only hope that we don’t lose sight of one thing — that it was all started by a mouse.” — Walt Disney
Every cast member at WDW is held to the exact same standard of guest service. In Merchandise, where I was a trainer, there is a specific procedure in which cast members are expected to interact with guests at the park, and they are candidly evaluated and graded at least once every few months by their managers. For example, a couple specific points on the evaluation include using the guest’s name, acknowledging children in the party, and informing them about upcoming events within the parks. (“Hi Carol, what a gorgeous little girl you have. What’s your name? Who’s your favorite princess, Suzy? Ariel? Did you know she’s going to be in 3 o’clock parade?”)
Wild Thing by X












What they said: